Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
Published: 2024-06-30

Prevalence and detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: an analytical study

Department of Microbiology, Autonomous State Medical College, Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Microbiology, Autonomous State Medical College, Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Statistics, Agra College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India
ACE 2 receptors, Bio Safety Lab, COVID-19, Cycle Threshold, RTPCR, India

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the healthcare system. RT-PCR has played a major role in the confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 thus helping in an early diagnosis, clinical interventions and patient isolation. This study was conducted to ascertain the importance of RT-PCR testing among symptomatic and asymptomatic cases in different age groups with association to infection. 

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from August 2020 to August 2021, in the Department of Microbiology, Autonomous State Medical College and Sarojini Naidu Memorial Hospital, Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. Samples were collected from a total of 342, 281 cases which comprised of symptomatic patients (ILI, SARI), asymptomatic contacts, those seeking hospitalization, travelers and were subjected to testing by RT-PCR. The cases were divided into group A of patients presenting with symptoms ≤7 days, group B of patients with signs and symptoms >7 days and group C comprised of asymptomatic cases. The symptoms of patients were associated with the Ct values of the E/N screening gene and the RdRp/ORF1ab confirmatory genes. The Chi-square test was done to test the statistical significance of association of symptomatic patients with the outcome of the test.

Results: The number of positive samples were 4,342 showing a prevalence of 1.3%. The maximum prevalence of infection was found in the age group of 20-29 years followed by the age group 30-39 years (p-value <0.05). The maximum positivity and high viral load were seen in the patients who presented with symptoms ≤7 days with Ct values ≤25.

Conclusion: The maximum infection was found in the young age group. The screening and confirmatory genes could be detected in the samples of asymptomatic cases also which was helpful in isolating them and breaking the chain of further spread of the virus.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ali Jadoo SA. COVID-19 pandemic is a worldwide typical biopsychosocial crisis. J Ideas Health. 2020;3(2):152-154. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47108/jidhealth.Vol3.Iss2.58
  2. Kuhfeld M, Soland J, Tarasawa B, Johnson A, Ruzek E, Liu J. Projecting the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on academic achievement. Edworkingpapers.com. 2020;8(49):549-565. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26300/cdrv-yw05
  3. IMF. World Economic Outlook. International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.; 2021. Available from: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO?page=2&vid=23#:~:text=Description%3A%20The%20global%20economy%20is,2021%2C%20especially%20for%20Emerging%20Asia.
  4. Jacobs J, Hardy L, Semret M, Lunguya O, Phe T, Affolabi D, Yansouni C, Vandenberg O. Diagnostic Bacteriology in District Hospitals in Sub-Saharan Africa: At the Forefront of the Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019;6:205. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00205
  5. Verna R, Alallon W, Murakami M, Hayward CPM, Harrath AH, Alwasel SH, Sumita NM, Alatas O, Fedeli V, Sharma P, et al. Analytical Performance of COVID-19 Detection Methods (RT-PCR): Scientific and Societal Concerns. Life. 2021;11(660). Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070660
  6. ICMR. COVID-19 Testing Labs in India. Indian Council of Medical Research; 2020. Available from: https://www.icmr.gov.in/pdf/covid/labs/archive/COVID_Testing_Labs_04102020.pdf
  7. Pandey P, Tiwari AK, Dara RC, Rawat GS, Negi A, Raina V. Confirmation and follow-up of initial “NAT yields”: Prospective study from a tertiary healthcare centre in India. Transfus Apher Sci. 2016;54(2):242-247. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2015.08.003 PMID: 26321477
  8. Tuli L, Patawa R. A One Man Army- TrueNat Testing for the Identification of COVID-19 in Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. J Clin Diag Res. 2022;5(16):1-5. DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2022/55742.16292
  9. CDC. Guidelines for Clinical Specimens Handling. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/guidelines-clinical-specimens.html#handling-specimen-safely
  10. ICMR. Advisory on Strategy for COVID-19 Testing in India (Version VI, dated 4th September 2020). Indian Council of Medical Research; 2020. Available from: https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/AdvisoryonstrategyforCOVID19TestinginIndia.pdf
  11. World Health Organization. Laboratory biosafety guidance related to the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Interim guidance. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/laboratory-biosafety-novel-coronavirus-Version-1-1.pdf?sfvrsn=912a9847_2
  12. MOHFW. Notification of ICMR testing in private COVID labs in India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2020. Available from: https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/NotificationofICMRguidelinesforCOVID19testinginprivatelaboratoriesinIndia.pdf
  13. Higuchi R, Fockler C, Dollinger G, Watson R. Kinetic PCR analysis: Real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Nat Biotechnol. 1993;11:1026-1030. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0993-1026
  14. Wong ML, Medrano JF. Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation. BioTechniques. 2005;39(1):75-85. https://doi.org/10.21144/0539RV01
  15. Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, Williams PM. Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res. 1996;6(10):986-994. doi:10.1101/gr.6.10.986
  16. Aranha C, Patel V, Bhor V, Gogoi D. Cycle threshold values in RT‐PCR to determine dynamics of SARS‐CoV‐2 viral load: An approach to reduce the isolation period for COVID‐19 patients. J Med Virol. 2021;1(4):6794-6797. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27206
  17. NHRC. Human rights advisory on rights of elderly persons in context of Covid-19. National Human Rights Commission; 2020. Available from: https://nhrc.nic.in/sites/default/files/NHRC%20Advisory%20on%20Elderly%20Persons.pdf
  18. Khazir M, Abdullah S, Singh G, Rajput G, Ahad W. Age groups affected by Covid-19 virus in India: An observational study. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2020;6(3):27-30.
  19. Panda BM, Lopamudra, Dalai S, Padhi S. Comparison of Covid19(SARS-CoV-2) infection, based on gender, age group and sequential waves by RT-PCR analysis among the population of western districts of Odisha. J Appl Pharma Res. 2023;1(11):26-32. DOI:10.18231/j.joapr.2023.11.1.26.32
  20. Gandhi S, Dakhode S. A Review on the Effect of COVID-19 Disease on Various age groups. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2023;1(11):148-153.
  21. Farghaly S, Makboul M. Correlation between age, sex, and severity of Coronavirus disease 19 based on chest computed tomography severity scoring system. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2021;52(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00408-1
  22. Alotaibi B, Thanaa A, Masry EL, Mohamed G, et al. SARS-CoV-2 in Egypt: epidemiology, clinical characterization and bioinformatics analysis. Heliyon. 2022;2(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08864.
  23. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1199-1207. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2001316.
  24. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-513.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7.
  25. Bulut C, Kato Y. Epidemiology of COVID-19. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50(SI-1):563-570. doi:10.3906/sag-2004-172.
  26. Poletti P, Tirani M, Cereda D, Trentini F, Guzzetta G, Sabatino G, et al. Association of age with likelihood of developing symptoms and critical disease among close contacts exposed to patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in Italy. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3). doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1085.
  27. The Guardian. Italy's elderly population at risk amid coronavirus outbreak. Published March 3, 2020. Accessed June 28, 2024. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/03/italy-elderly-population-coronavirus-risk-covid-19.
  28. Priya PD. Impression of COVID-19 on the life years of inhabitants in Tamil Nadu, India. Shanlax Int J Econ. 2023;4(11):24-29. doi:10.34293/economics.v11i4.6522.
  29. Bwire GM. Coronavirus: Why men are more vulnerable to COVID-19 than women? SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2(7):874-876. doi:10.1007/s42399-020-00341-w.
  30. Cao Y, Li L, Feng Z, Wan S, Huang P, Sun X, et al. Comparative genetic analysis of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2) receptor ACE2 in different populations. Cell Discov. 2020;6:4-7. doi:10.1038/s41421-020-0147-1.
  31. Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Ma Y, Zuo W. Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the receptor of SARS-CoV-2. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202:756-759. doi:10.1101/20200126919985.
  32. Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Ma Y, Zuo W. Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the putative receptor of Wuhan 2019-nCoV. bioRxiv. 2020.01.26.919985. doi:10.1101/2020.01.26.919985.
  33. Ghazeeri G, Abdullah L, Abbas O. Immunological differences in women compared with men: overview and contributing factors. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;66(3):163-169. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01052.x.
  34. Elgendy IY, Pepine CJ. Why are women better protected from COVID-19: clues for men? Sex and COVID-19. Int J Cardiol. 2020;315:105-106. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.026. Epub 2020 May 11. PMID: 32418736; PMCID: PMC7211570.
  35. Zhang HJ, Su YY, Xu SL, et al. Asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in close contacts of COVID-19 patients: a seroepidemiological study [e-pub ahead of print]. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa771.
  36. Li YH, Hu CY, Wu NP, Yao HP, Li LJ. Molecular characteristics, functions, and related pathogenicity of MERS-CoV proteins. Engineering (Beijing). 2019;5:940-947. doi:10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.035.
  37. Skariyachan S, Challapilli SB, Packirisamy S, Kumargowda ST, Sridhar VS. Recent aspects on the pathogenesis mechanism, animal models and novel therapeutic interventions for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infections. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:569-587. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00569.
  38. Xia S, Zhu Y, Liu M, et al. Fusion mechanism of 2019-nCoV and fusion inhibitors targeting HR1 domain in spike protein. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17:765-767. doi:10.1038/s41423-020-0374-2.
  39. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, Zhan C, Chen C, Lv W, Tao Q, Sun Z, Xia L. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases. Radiology. 2020;296. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200642.
  40. Sohag AAM, Hannan MA, Rahman S, Hossain M, Hasan M, Khan MK, Khatun A, Dash R, Uddin MJ. Revisiting potential druggable targets against SARS-CoV-2 and repurposing therapeutics under preclinical study and clinical trials: a comprehensive review. Drug Dev Res. 2020;81(8):919-941. doi:10.1002/ddr.21709.
  41. Godet M, L'Haridon R, Vautherot JF, Laude H. TGEV coronavirus ORF4 encodes a membrane protein that is incorporated into virions. Virology. 1992;188:666-675. doi:10.1016/0042-6822(92)90521-p.
  42. Attia YA, El-Saadony MT, Swelum AA, et al. COVID-19: pathogenesis, advances in treatment and vaccine development and environmental impact—an updated review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28:22241-22264. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13018-1.
  43. Rao SN, Manissero D, Steele VR, Pareja J. A narrative systematic review of the clinical utility of cycle threshold values in the context of COVID-19. Infect Dis Ther. 2020;9(3):573-586. doi:10.1007/s40121-020-00324-3.
  44. Sarkar B, Sinha R, Sarkar K. Initial viral load of a COVID-19-infected case indicated by its cycle threshold value of polymerase chain reaction could be used as a predictor of its transmissibility: an experience from Gujarat, India. Indian J Community Med. 2020;(45):278-282.
  45. Soria ME, Cortón M, Martínez-González B, Lobo-Vega R, Vázquez-Sirvent L, López-Rodríguez R, Almoguera B, Mahillo I, Mínguez P, Herrero A, Taracido JC, Macías-Valcayo A, Esteban J, Fernandez-Roblas R, Gadea I, Ruíz-Hornillos J, Ayuso C, Perales C. High SARS-CoV-2 viral load is associated with a worse clinical outcome of COVID-19 disease. Access Microbiol. 2021 Sep 21;3(9):000259. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000259.
  46. Shah S, Singhal T, Davar N, Thakkar P. No correlation between Ct values and severity of disease or mortality in patients with COVID-19 disease. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021;39(1):116-117. doi:10.1016/j.ijmb.2020.10.021.
  47. Jemmieh K, Tawengi M, Alyaarabi T, et al. No association between Ct value and COVID-19 severity and mortality in Qatar. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:5323-5331. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S404696.
  48. Sajjad H, Majeed M, Imtiaz S, Siddiqah M, Sajjad A, Din M, Ali M. Origin, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment options for SARS-CoV-2: a review. Biologia. 2021;76:2655-2673. doi:10.1007/s11756-021-00792-z.


How to Cite

1.
Lekha Tuli LT, Shariq M, Patawa R. Prevalence and detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: an analytical study. jidhealth [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];7(3):1052-60. Available from: https://www.jidhealth.com/index.php/jidhealth/article/view/344