When technology goes dark: implications of a complete digital shutdown on medical practice and medical education

Article Sidebar

Full Text PDF
Published: 2026-02-28
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47108/esrmz244
Keywords:
Digital Health Resilience, Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Geomagnetic Storm, Healthcare Systems, Medical Education

Main Article Content

Saad Ahmed Ali Jadoo
Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Diyala, Diyala, Iraq
Mustafa Ali Mustafa Al-Samarrai
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Anbar University, Anbar, Iraq
Ahmed Kassid Alwan
College of Dentistry, University of Diyala, Iraq
Anmar Shukur Mahmood
Faculty of Computer Engineering, Altinbas University, Istanbul, Turkiye

Abstract

Contemporary healthcare delivery is deeply intertwined with digital systems, including electronic health records (EHRs), artificial intelligence (AI) supported diagnostics, telemedicine, robotic surgery platforms, and automated laboratory technologies. While these systems have enhanced efficiency, safety, and accessibility, they have also introduced structural dependence on interconnected digital infrastructure. A prolonged and comprehensive technological shutdown whether triggered by large-scale cyberattacks, geomagnetic solar disturbances, grid failure, or geopolitical conflict would have far-reaching implications for clinical care, hospital management, surgical practice, and medical education. This paper examines how such a collapse might affect diagnostic accuracy, procedural outcomes, healthcare coordination, and training models. It also proposes preparedness frameworks and recovery strategies aimed at strengthening resilience. Although the immediate impact would likely compromise efficiency and outcomes, healthcare systems that maintain strong foundational clinical competencies and operational redundancy may better withstand digital disruption. Technological advancement should remain aligned with resilience planning to ensure continuity of care under extreme conditions.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

1.
When technology goes dark: implications of a complete digital shutdown on medical practice and medical education. J Ideas Health [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 28 [cited 2026 Mar. 7];9(1):1390-2. Available from: https://www.jidhealth.com/index.php/jidhealth/article/view/440

References

1. Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542(7639):115–8. doi:10.1038/nature21056

2. McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, et al. international evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020;577:89–94. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6

3. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:44–56. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7

4. Mann DM, Chen J, Chunara R, et al. COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(7):1132–5. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa072

5. World Health Organization. Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. Geneva: WHO; 2021.

6. Ranschaert ER, Morozov S, Algra PR. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: opportunities, applications and risks. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:3573–82.

7. Healthcare and Public Health Sector Coordinating Council. Health industry cybersecurity practices. 2023.

8. Eastwood JP, Biffis E, Hapgood MA, et al. The economic impact of space weather. Risk Anal. 2017;37(2):206–18. doi:10.1111/risa.12765

9. Oughton EJ, Skelton A, Horne RB, et al. Quantifying the daily economic impact of extreme space weather. Space Weather. 2017;15:65–83. doi:10.1002/2016SW001491

10. Campanella P, Lovato E, Marone C, et al. The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality. Eur J Public Health. 2016;26(1):60–4.

11. Lippi G, Da Rin G. Advantages and limitations of total laboratory automation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(6):802–11.

12. Verghese A, Charlton B, Kassirer JP, Ramsey M. Inadequacies of physical examination as a cause of medical errors. Am J Med. 2015;128(12):1322–4.

13. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004;239(1):14–21.

14. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD006231.

15. Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):533–4.

16. Ellaway RH, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):455–73.

17. Cabitza F, Rasoini R, Gensini GF. Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine. JAMA. 2017;318(6):517–8.

18. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, et al. Does simulation-based medical education improve patient outcomes? Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706–11.

19. Ali Jadoo SA, Mahmood A, Alsamurai M. Artificial intelligence in the Iraqi health system: challenges, opportunities, and pathways towards universal health coverage J Ideas Health. 2025 Aug. 31 ;8(4):1309-1312. doi: 10.47108/jidhealth.Vol8.Iss4.42